Patello-Femoral
Replacement

Custom Fit

Patello-Femoral Replacement system video preview

Clinical Results Report

Surgical Techniques Report

Comparison of clinical results for KineMatch to other PFR systems

*US Patent No. 6,712,856 and 6,905,514; additiional US and foreign patents pending

“The KineMatch device has offered a remarkable benefit and return to function for a number of my patients with intractable patello-femoral disease who were otherwise facing the prospect of patellectomy or TKR.”

Domenick J. Sisto, MD
Sherman Oaks, California

Citations related to patello-femoral joint replacement

  1. Arciero RA and Toomey HE (1988). Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A three- to nine-year follow-up study.
    Clin Orthop. 236: 60-71.
  2. Argenson JN, Guillaume JM, and Aubaniac JM (1995).
    Is there a place for patellofemoral arthroplasty? Clin Orthop. 321: 162-7.
  3. Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Broukhim B, and Ivey FM (1979). Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop. 144: 98-102.
  4. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, and Grelsamer R (1990). Patellofemoral arthroplasty. 2-12-year follow-up study.
    J Arthroplasty 5(1): 49-55.
  5. Krajca-Radcliffe JB and Coker TP (1996). Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A 2- to 18-year followup study. Clin Orthop.
    330: 143-51.
  6. Lonner JH (1999). Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Seminars in Arthroplasty 10(1): 48-54.
  7. Sisto DJ (1995). Custom patellofemoral joint replacement. 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Orlando, FL.
  8. Sisto DJ (1996). Custom patellofemoral replacement. 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Atlanta, GA.
  9. Sisto DJ and Cook DL (1997). Total knee replacement in patients with a failed patellofemoral replacement. 64th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA.
  10. Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, and Shah NA (2001). The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty. A five- to ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(5): 696-701.
Products
Orthopedic Products
SuperCableª
CarboJetª Lavage
KineMatchª PFR
NaviProª Hip
NaviProª  Knee
NaviProª  Shoulder
Gemª Total Knee System
Option Hip System
Allograft Tissues
Neurosurgical/Spine Products
NeuroPro¨ Fixation System
Prestaª  Cervical Allograft
Allograft Tissues

 


Technology your patients can appreciate

KineMatch™ Patello-Femoral Replacement*

Designed specifically for the small but challenging group of patients with isolated, end-stage patello-femoral disease, the KineMatch PFR offers a uniquely conservative and effective resurfacing solution. Because the device is custom-fit to the patient’s anatomy using CT data, no resection of femoral bone is required, thus preserving bone stock for the future. A standard dome patella implant is used in conjunction with the femoral component.

And because the goal is not only to reduce pain but also to improve function, the KineMatch PFR is designed to restore knee kinematics by rebuilding the patellar groove for improved patellar tracking and by restoring the A-P position of the patella for proper quadriceps function.

The device is implanted in a simple surgical procedure with minimal joint disruption. A drill template matching the implant in both femoral fit and perimeter shape is provided for each case. The drill template margin is marked and the cartilage is removed from the bone in the area under the femoral component. Three peg holes are drilled in the anterior femur using the template. The CoCr femoral and UHMWPe patella implants are fixed via their pegs using bone cement.

Femoral components thickness is kept to a minimum in order to replicate normal cartilage thickness and provide for normal joint kinematics

 

Benefits of KineMatch™ Patello-Femoral Replacement

  • Created to address intractable patello-femoral disease when other treatment options have failed.
  • Designed to approximate normal kinematics by re-establishing trochlear groove alignment and depth while providing an anatomic sulcus to facilitate proper patella tracking
  • Avoids femoral bone resection by utilizing CT modeling technology to achieve individual custom fit to the patient’s distal anterior femoral anatomy.
  • Custom fit minimizes problems of soft tissue impingement often seen with “off-the-shelf” patello-femoral implant designs.
  • As compared to total knee replacement rehabilitation time is significantly decreased.
  • As compared to total knee replacement post-operative knee function is better.

Generally operative time is significantly less than total knee surgery.

Patello-Femoral Replacement system video preview
To see a video preview of the Patello-Femoral Replacement system visit the Video Journal of Orthopedics website at the link below. Look for "Internet Streaming Video" on the right side of the page and click on the link below "Preview this video synopsis (free) "

Click here to view the video preview

Clinical Results Report

Surgical Techniques Report

Comparison of clinical results for KineMatch to other PFR systems

 

 
KINAMED INCORPORATED • 820 Flynn Road • Camarillo, CA 93012
Phone Toll-Free (800) 827-5775 •  (805) 384-2748 • Fax (805) 384-2792
©2008 Kinamed INC.
All Rights Reserved